Monday, March 23, 2026

Accident

 https://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2026/03/23/collision-a-laeroport-laguardia-un-probleme-de-communication-en-cause


Copilot:

La Guardia Accident; are pilots well informed about weather and tarmac conditions where they will be landing?

Yes — pilots are normally very well informed about weather and runway conditions before landing. What happened at LaGuardia in the recent Air Canada accident was not due to a lack of weather or tarmac information, but rather a ground‑vehicle incursion: the aircraft struck a fire truck that should not have been on the runway. 

Below is a clear breakdown of what pilots do know, how they get that information, and why accidents like this still happen.

🛬 What Pilots Know Before Landing

🌦️ Weather Information (Very Detailed & Mandatory)

Pilots receive:

METARs (real‑time airport weather)

TAFs (forecast for the next hours)

ATIS (live broadcast of wind, visibility, runway in use, braking action, NOTAMs)

Onboard weather radar and air traffic control updates

Weather literacy is a core part of pilot training, and pilots are legally required to review all available weather information before every flight. 

🛣️ Runway & Tarmac Conditions

Pilots are informed of:

Runway surface condition reports (dry, wet, icy, contaminated)

Braking action reports from other aircraft

NOTAMs about closures, construction, lighting outages

Runway friction measurements (in winter)

Which runway is active and its length, slope, and lighting

This information is continuously updated and broadcast via ATIS and ATC.


🧭 So Why Did the LaGuardia Accident Happen?

The LaGuardia crash was not caused by weather or poor runway conditions.

It was caused by a runway incursion: a fire‑rescue truck was on the runway when the aircraft landed. Multiple reports confirm the aircraft collided with the emergency vehicle shortly after touchdown. 

CBC even reports that the air traffic controller was heard telling the truck to stop moments before the collision, suggesting a breakdown in ground coordination rather than pilot situational awareness. 

🧩 Why Pilots Can Still Be Vulnerable Despite Good Information

Even with perfect weather and runway data, pilots rely on:

ATC to keep the runway clear

Ground vehicles to obey instructions

Airport operations to coordinate emergency movements

A runway incursion can happen faster than a pilot can react, especially at night or in low visibility.

This is why runway incursions are one of the most feared hazards in aviation — they bypass many layers of pilot preparation.

🛡️ Bottom Line

Pilots are extremely well informed about:

Weather

Runway conditions

Braking action

Airport configuration

But they cannot see or predict unauthorized vehicles on the runway.

The LaGuardia tragedy appears to be a ground‑coordination failure, not a failure of pilot awareness.

If you want, I can also break down:

How runway incursion prevention systems work

What pilots see in the cockpit during landing

How airports manage emergency vehicles during active operations


Montreal has lately seen a great deal of icy roads, freezing rain... we keep vaccilating around the freezing point at this time of year. How much of an impact would an icy runway make to a passenger plane. Would one want to slow down in pouring rain??

You’re describing exactly the kind of winter pattern that makes Québec aviation… interesting. When the temperature hovers around 0 °C, runways can swing from wet to icy in minutes, and that absolutely affects how an airliner lands. Let’s unpack it in a way that’s both practical and physically grounded.

❄️ How Much Does an Icy Runway Affect a Passenger Plane?

A lot — but not in the “plane can’t stop” Hollywood sense. Modern aircraft and airports are designed for this, but the margins shrink.


🧊 1. Braking effectiveness drops sharply

On a dry runway, braking action is “GOOD.”

On ice, it can drop to “MEDIUM,” “POOR,” or even “NIL.”

This affects:

Landing distance required

Reverse thrust usage

Approach speed margins

Pilot decision-making (go/no‑go)

A runway that is perfectly safe when dry may become unusable for certain aircraft types when icy.


🛬 2. Pilots adjust their landing technique

On icy or contaminated runways, pilots:

Use lower approach speeds (within safe limits)

Aim for a firm touchdown (to ensure wheels spin up and brakes work)

Deploy maximum reverse thrust earlier

Avoid floating or “greasing” the landing

A soft landing is not what you want on ice — you want the wheels solidly on the ground so the anti‑skid system can do its job.


🚫 3. If braking action is too poor, they simply won’t land

Pilots will divert if:

Braking action reports are “NIL”

The runway is too short for the conditions

Freezing rain is actively coating the surface faster than crews can treat it

This is why Montréal airports sometimes suspend operations during intense freezing rain.


🌧️ Would a Pilot Want to Slow Down in Pouring Rain?

Counterintuitive answer: not too much.

🌧️💨 Rain itself doesn’t reduce braking like ice does

A wet runway increases stopping distance, but not catastrophically.

However, hydroplaning becomes a risk at higher speeds.

To manage this:

Pilots use slightly lower approach speeds, but not excessively low

They aim for a positive touchdown

Anti‑skid systems prevent wheel lockup

Reverse thrust does most of the early deceleration

Slowing down too much in heavy rain can actually be unsafe because:

The aircraft may become unstable on approach

Wind shear becomes more dangerous

Stall margins shrink

So the goal is controlled, stable, slightly slower — not dramatically slower.


🧩 Why Freezing Rain Is the Worst Case

Freezing rain is uniquely dangerous because:

It creates smooth, transparent ice (glaze ice)

It forms faster than crews can remove it

It affects both the aircraft and the runway

It can change conditions within minutes

This is why airports often shut down during severe episodes — not because planes can’t fly, but because runways can’t be kept safe.

🛡️ Bottom Line

Icy runways significantly increase landing distance and can make a runway unusable.

Pilots adjust technique but will divert if braking action is too poor.

Rain alone is manageable, but freezing rain is a different beast entirely.

Slowing down too much in rain is unsafe, so pilots balance stability with stopping distance.


If you want, I can also break down:

How runway friction is measured in winter

Why Montréal’s climate (especially around 0 °C) is uniquely challenging

How anti‑skid and reverse thrust actually work on ice

                                                                       *     *     *
No two people will handle instructions in precisely the same way. Let's say my pilot is a Slow Sally with respect to other pilots, likes to slow down a tad in the rain. Would ATC be able to see this; is there feed-back about what the plane is actually up to?

You’re absolutely right that no two pilots fly identically. Some are more conservative with speed, some are more assertive, some like a slightly longer flare, some plant it firmly. Aviation tolerates that individuality as long as the pilot stays within the safe, published envelope.

But here’s the key: ATC absolutely sees what the aircraft is doing in real time, and there are multiple layers of feedback that prevent a “Slow Sally” from becoming a hazard.

Let me break it down in a way that shows how the system keeps everyone honest without micromanaging the pilot.
🛫 What ATC Can See About an Aircraft’s Behavior
📡 1. Radar shows speed, altitude, and track
Controllers see:

Ground speed
Altitude
Rate of descent
Heading
Position relative to the runway
If a pilot is slowing more than expected on approach, ATC sees the speed trend immediately.

🛬 2. Tower controllers visually monitor the approach
At major airports like Montréal:

Tower controllers literally watch the aircraft on final
They can judge spacing, stability, and speed visually
They can instruct a go‑around if the approach looks unstable
A pilot who is dragging in too slowly will be told to correct or go around.

🛰️ 3. ADS‑B broadcasts the aircraft’s exact state
Modern aircraft transmit:
True airspeed
Ground speed
Vertical speed
Position
Heading
Even selected altitude
This is visible to ATC and, in many cases, to the public on sites like FlightRadar24.

🧭 What ATC Doesn’t Do
ATC does not dictate:
Exact approach speed
How the pilot configures the aircraft
When they deploy flaps or gear
How aggressively they brake
Those are pilot‑in‑command decisions, based on aircraft type, weight, weather, and airline procedures.

But ATC does enforce:
Proper spacing
Safe sequencing
Stable approach criteria indirectly (by ordering go‑arounds)

🌧️ What If “Slow Sally” Likes to Slow Down in Rain?
Here’s the nuance:

✔️ If the pilot slows within the aircraft’s normal approach envelope
Totally fine.
ATC sees the speed but doesn’t care as long as:
Spacing is maintained
The approach is stable
The aircraft crosses the threshold at a safe speed

❌ If the pilot slows so much that spacing collapses
ATC intervenes:

“Air Canada 123, increase speed to 160 knots to the marker.”
Or, if too late: “Air Canada 123, go around.”

Controllers routinely issue speed instructions on final to maintain flow.

✔️ ATC also knows the weather
They know:
Rain intensity
Wind shear alerts
Runway braking action
Whether pilots are likely to fly slightly slower
So a cautious pilot isn’t a surprise — it’s expected in poor conditions.

🛡️ The System Is Built for Human Variation
Aviation assumes:
Some pilots are more conservative
Some are more aggressive
Some are more precise
Some are more “Slow Sally”
The safety net is multilayered:

ATC radar
Tower visual oversight
ADS‑B telemetry
Airline standard operating procedures
Stable approach criteria
Go‑around policies
A pilot can have personal style, but they can’t drift outside the safe envelope without someone noticing.

✨ If you’re curious…
I can also explain:
How “stable approach criteria” work
How pilots decide their exact approach speed
Why rain encourages firmness, not softness, on landing
How runway occupancy time is monitored
Just tell me where you want to go next.

                                                            *     *     *
Tower vs Ground:

No comments: