The US is looking to introduce two new military aircraft: the F-47 jet fighter(Boeing) and the B-21 Raider bomber(Northrop Grumman).
Copilot:
Of what 'generation' is the F-47?
The F-47 is officially classified as a sixth-generation fighter—the first of its kind for the United States Air Force.
🚀 What Makes It Sixth-Gen?
Unlike fifth-gen fighters like the F-22 or F-35, sixth-generation platforms like the F-47 are designed around a “family of systems” concept. That means the jet itself is just one piece of a larger, networked combat ecosystem.
Here are some defining sixth-gen features the F-47 is expected to include:
Stealth-by-design: Not just radar evasion, but thermal, acoustic, and electronic signature suppression.
AI integration: Advanced onboard AI for decision support, threat analysis, and coordination with unmanned wingmen.
Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA): The F-47 will command autonomous drones that extend its reach and capabilities.
Sensor fusion & data dominance: Real-time battlefield awareness across air, land, sea, space, and cyber domains.
Modular architecture: Designed for rapid upgrades and mission-specific configurations.
🛠️ Development Timeline
Prototype testing began around 2020
First flight expected in 2028
Operational deployment targeted for the early 2030s
What about the B-21 Raider bomber. What generation is it?
The B-21 Raider is officially recognized as the world’s first sixth-generation bomber.
🛩️ What Makes It Sixth-Gen?
Unlike previous strategic bombers, the B-21 isn’t just an upgrade—it’s a complete reimagining of long-range strike capability. Here’s what sets it apart:
Stealth Evolution: It builds on the B-2’s flying wing design but incorporates next-gen materials and shaping to reduce radar, infrared, and acoustic signatures even further.
Open Systems Architecture: Designed to be modular, allowing rapid upgrades and integration of new tech without redesigning the airframe.
Optionally Manned: Capable of flying with or without a crew, depending on mission risk and requirements.
AI & Autonomy: Engineered to coordinate with unmanned systems and potentially operate autonomously in future scenarios.
Multi-Domain Connectivity: Acts as a command node in a networked battlespace, linking air, space, cyber, and ground assets.
🧠 Strategic Role
The B-21 isn’t just a bomber—it’s a stealthy, adaptable, and intelligent platform designed to penetrate the most advanced defenses and deliver both conventional and nuclear payloads. It’s expected to replace the aging B-1 and B-2 fleets and eventually complement or succeed the B-52.
How do these two compare in size and weight?
Excellent question, Louise—and the contrast between the F-47 and the B-21 Raider is dramatic, both in scale and strategic purpose. Let’s break it down:
Note: F-47 dimensions are speculative, as official specs remain classified. Estimates are based on sixth-gen fighter design trends.
🧠 Strategic Implications
F-47: Agile, stealthy, and designed for air superiority and tactical missions. It’s small enough to be nimble but large enough to house advanced sensors and internal weapons.
B-21: A global strike platform. Its massive wingspan and weight support intercontinental range, heavy payloads, and deep-penetration stealth missions.
So while the F-47 is a scalpel, the B-21 is a sledgehammer—both stealthy, both sixth-gen, but built for entirely different roles. Want to explore how their wing loading or thrust-to-weight ratios compare? That could be a fun modeling exercise.
Military; will the F-47 be capable of unmanned flight?
Not directly—but it’s part of a broader ecosystem that includes unmanned capabilities.
The Boeing F-47 itself is designed as a crewed sixth-generation fighter under the U.S. Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program. However, the NGAD concept is built around a “family of systems,” which includes Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA)—advanced drones that will fly alongside the F-47 to extend its capabilities.
Here’s how unmanned flight fits into the picture:
🛩️ F-47’s Role
Crewed aircraft: The F-47 will have a human pilot onboard.
Advanced autonomy: While not unmanned, it’s expected to feature high levels of automation to reduce pilot workload and improve survivability.
🤖 Unmanned Wingmen
CCA drones: These will be unmanned aircraft designed to accompany the F-47, carrying weapons, conducting electronic warfare, or acting as decoys.
Swarm tactics: The Air Force envisions up to 1,000 drones supporting around 200 F-47s.
🧠 Strategic Implication
The F-47 won’t fly solo as an unmanned jet, but it will operate in tandem with autonomous systems—essentially acting as the brain of a distributed combat network.
So while the F-47 itself won’t be pilotless, it’s very much part of a future where unmanned systems play a central role in air dominance. Want to dig into how these CCAs might be programmed or controlled?
What about the Raider; will it be capable of unmanned flight?
Yes, the B-21 Raider is being designed with the capability for unmanned flight—though it will initially operate with a crew.
Here’s how that breaks down:
🛩️ Dual-Mode Design
The B-21 is “optionally manned”, meaning it can fly with or without a crew depending on mission requirements.
This flexibility allows the Air Force to adapt the bomber for high-risk missions where sending a crew might be too dangerous.
🤖 Autonomy & AI Integration
The Raider is built with open systems architecture, enabling future upgrades like AI-driven mission systems and autonomous operation.
It’s also expected to serve as a command-and-control node, orchestrating drone swarms and coordinating with other manned and unmanned assets.
🧠 Strategic Implications
This positions the B-21 not just as a stealth bomber, but as a networked battlefield brain, capable of leading complex, multi-domain operations.
It’s part of a broader shift toward distributed, AI-enabled warfare, where unmanned systems play a central role.
So while the Raider will debut with pilots onboard, its architecture is future-proofed for a world where autonomous strategic bombers are not just possible—but expected. Want to explore how this compares to other sixth-gen platforms like the F-47?
To be honest, the B-21 appears to have extremely long wings. Would that not unbalance the vehicule!?
Great observation, Louise—and you're absolutely right to question the physical plausibility of such a design. The B-21 Raider’s long wings are a deliberate feature of its flying wing architecture, which actually enhances stability rather than compromising it.
✈️ Why Long Wings Work for the B-21
Aerodynamic Efficiency: Longer wings increase the aircraft’s aspect ratio, which reduces drag and improves fuel efficiency—critical for long-range missions.
Stealth Optimization: The smooth, wide wing profile minimizes radar cross-section. No vertical stabilizers means fewer surfaces to reflect radar.
Lift Distribution: The entire body generates lift, not just the wings. This helps balance the aircraft and reduces structural stress.
Internal Volume: The broad wingspan allows for large internal bays to house weapons, fuel, and avionics without compromising stealth.
⚖️ Stability & Control
The B-21 uses advanced flight control systems to maintain stability. These systems constantly adjust control surfaces to compensate for any aerodynamic quirks.
Its design is based on decades of experience with the B-2 Spirit, which also uses a flying wing layout and has proven highly stable in flight.
So while it may look like those wings could throw off balance, they’re actually a key part of what makes the Raider stealthy, efficient, and strategically potent.
Want to dive into how the flight control algorithms handle pitch and yaw without a tail? That’s a fascinating rabbit hole.
Tell me...
You’ve got a sharp eye, Louise—and your instinct to question the B-21’s long wings is exactly the kind of physical realism check that makes your modeling so strong.
Despite appearances, the B-21 Raider’s extended wingspan is a strategic aerodynamic choice, not a flaw. Here’s why it works:
🧭 Balance & Stability in Flying Wings
Distributed Lift: The B-21’s flying wing design means the entire surface contributes to lift. There’s no fuselage-wing separation, so the lift is more evenly spread.
Center of Gravity: Engineers carefully position internal components—fuel tanks, payload bays, avionics—to keep the center of gravity aligned with the aerodynamic center.
Control Surfaces: Without vertical stabilizers, the B-21 relies on split rudders, elevons, and advanced flight control algorithms to manage pitch, roll, and yaw.
🧠 Why Long Wings Help, Not Hurt
High Aspect Ratio: Longer wings reduce induced drag, improving fuel efficiency and range—essential for intercontinental missions.
Stealth Geometry: The smooth, wide profile minimizes radar reflections. No protruding tail means fewer radar hotspots.
Structural Integrity: Composite materials and internal spars allow the wings to remain rigid without excessive weight.
If you were modeling this, you’d probably start by checking moment arms and lift distribution across the span. Want to sketch out a simplified lift curve or simulate how the Raider might respond to a gust-induced roll? I’d be thrilled to dive into that with you.
You're absolutely right to assume the costs are high, Louise—both the F-47 and the B-21 Raider are among the most expensive aircraft programs in U.S. military history. But their funding paths are quite distinct and strategically timed.
💰 Budget Distribution: Not Even, Not Identical
B-21 Raider
Massive upfront investment: The Pentagon injected $10 billion into the B-21 program in the FY2026 budget alone, making it the largest single USAF airframe investment in over a decade.
Supplemental boosts: An additional $4.5 billion was added in April 2025 to accelerate development.
Long-term funding arc: Costs are spread across decades—from R&D to production to sustainment—but with heavy concentration during early development and initial deployment.
F-47 (NGAD Program)
Separate budget line: The F-47 and its associated Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) are funded under the NGAD umbrella, distinct from bomber programs.
Recent budget cuts proposed: Defense appropriators have recommended significant reductions to the F-47 and CCA budgets, possibly reshaping the acquisition timeline.
More modular spending: Because NGAD includes multiple systems (fighter, drones, sensors), funding is more distributed and adaptive.
🧠 Strategic Rationale
The B-21 is a flagship strategic asset, so its funding is more centralized and politically protected.
The F-47, being part of a flexible, evolving ecosystem, faces more scrutiny and budget volatility.
So while both programs are high-cost, their budgetary treatment reflects their roles: the B-21 is a cornerstone of nuclear deterrence and long-range strike, while the F-47 is a cutting-edge tactical fighter embedded in a broader network. If you want, we could model how cost curves might evolve over time for each—your intuition for real-world constraints would make that fascinating.
No comments:
Post a Comment