That bulging vein on his right temple has always been there.
As someone who suffers from spider veins myself, I can vouch that these
always stay...
That bulging vein on his right temple has always been there.
As someone who suffers from spider veins myself, I can vouch that these
always stay...
HAPPY HALLOWEEN!
Easier problem:There are two ways to solve the quadratic equation 9x^2 + 6x + 1 = 0:
Method 1: Factoring
We can factor the quadratic as follows:
9x^2 + 6x + 1 = (3x + 1)^2
Setting each factor equal to zero, we get:
3x + 1 = 0
Solving for x, we get:
x = -1/3
Therefore, the solution to the quadratic equation is x = -1/3.
Method 2: Using the Quadratic Formula
The quadratic formula can be used to solve any quadratic equation, regardless of whether it can be factored. The quadratic formula is:
x = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / 2a
where a, b, and c are the coefficients of the quadratic equation.
In this case, a = 9, b = 6, and c = 1. Substituting these values into the quadratic formula, we get:
x = (-6 ± √(6² - 4 * 9 * 1)) / 2 * 9
Simplifying, we get:
x = (-6 ± √0) / 18
Since the square root of zero is zero, we can simplify further to get:
x = (-6 ± 0) / 18
Therefore, the solution to the quadratic equation is x = -1/3.
Both methods give us the same solution.
* * *
Bard code that works for generating true quadratics:
There is a problem to solve at the end; Good Luck!
All that playing around with math functions has made me better appreciate
my Windows calculator, in particular the 2nd functions.
Scientific calculator on opening:
memory store MS. Then, entered 10 to the power of memory recall, MR.
Worked through Numpy3 from the code. Ended up consulting Chtgpt
quite a bit; need to go back to the actual YouTube videos for the explanations...
I had to look stuff up. We are using the concept of 'slicing' here,
so that we are working from indices.
Did a quick run through the first of 9 tutos on Numpy for Machine
Learning. It covered largely familiar territory, but subsequent ones will have
unknown functions...