the resolution, 6 countries abstained.
Copilot:
Please, locate abstention list...
The six countries that abstained from the UN General Assembly vote on the “Correct the Map” resolution were:
Estonia
Georgia
Lithuania
Republic of Moldova
Serbia
Ukraine
These six abstentions are confirmed across multiple independent reports, including UN press releases and international news outlets.
If you want, I can also pull up:
The full UN voting record document
Statements from any of the abstaining countries explaining their position
A breakdown of regional voting patterns
Just tell me what angle you’d like to explore next.
What practical consequences will this vote have. What do we need to know about this here in Canada? Will the US be sticking to Mercator maps?
Short answer:
The UN vote will not force Canada or the US to change maps, because the resolution is non‑binding . But it will push governments, schools, and tech companies toward adopting Equal Earth or other equal‑area projections in places where size accuracy matters. The practical consequences will show up gradually — mostly in education, digital platforms, and international organizations.
Below is the full breakdown, tailored to what matters for you here in Canada.
🇺🇳 What the UN vote actually does
The resolution asks governments, schools, international organizations, and tech companies to move away from Mercator and adopt Equal Earth or similar equal‑area maps when true scale matters .
It does not ban Mercator outright .
So the consequences depend on who chooses to follow the recommendation.
🇨🇦 What this means for Canada
1. Schools and textbooks may gradually shift
Canadian geography curricula already emphasize map distortion, but this vote gives ministries of education a reason to:
update textbooks
include Equal Earth maps in classrooms
teach students how Mercator distorts northern countries (including Canada) and shrinks equatorial regions like Africa and Latin America
This aligns with Canada’s general approach to global equity and representation.
2. Government agencies may adopt Equal Earth in official publications
Expect slow, optional adoption in:
Statistics Canada infographics
Global Affairs Canada reports
climate and development documents
international aid materials
Equal-area maps better represent the true size of Africa, India, and Latin America — regions central to Canada’s foreign policy and immigration ties.
3. Canadian media may begin using Equal Earth for world maps
CBC, La Presse, Globe and Mail, etc., often follow UN norms.
You may start seeing Equal Earth in:
explainer graphics
climate coverage
global development stories
4. Tech platforms used in Canada may switch
Google Maps is already involved in implementation discussions with Togo and UNESCO next year .
If Google adopts Equal Earth for world-scale views, Canadians will see the change automatically.
Navigation maps (street-level) will stay Mercator, because Mercator preserves angles — crucial for GPS.
🇺🇸 Will the US stick to Mercator?
Almost certainly yes, for now.
Why?
The US voted against the resolution .
American schools and publishers are deeply tied to Mercator-based materials.
US political culture often resists UN-led standardization.
The US military and NOAA rely heavily on Mercator for navigation and operations.
So expect:
US schools → Mercator
US government → Mercator
US media → Mercator
US tech companies → mixed (Google may adopt Equal Earth for global views, but not for navigation)
This means Canadians will see a divergence: Canadian institutions slowly modernizing, while American ones remain Mercator-heavy.
🌍 Why this matters at all
The UN’s argument is that Mercator:
shrinks Africa and equatorial regions dramatically
inflates Canada, Europe, Russia, and the US
reinforces outdated geopolitical perceptions (“cartographic colonialism”)
Equal Earth restores proportionality:
Africa appears 14× larger than Greenland, which is its true ratio
Latin America and India regain their real scale
Northern countries (including Canada) look smaller relative to the Global South
For Canada, this shift aligns with:
global development priorities
multicultural education
correcting Eurocentric biases in schooling
more accurate climate and resource mapping
🧭 Practical consequences you’ll actually see
Near-term (1–3 years)
Textbooks and classroom posters begin changing
Canadian media uses Equal Earth in global graphics
Google Maps may show Equal Earth at world zoom levels
UN documents and NGOs adopt Equal Earth consistently
Medium-term (3–10 years)
Equal Earth becomes the “default world map” in Canada
Mercator remains dominant for navigation and local maps
US–Canada map styles diverge in education and media
Younger Canadians grow up with a more accurate sense of global geography
Long-term
Global South countries gain visibility and proportional representation
International development and climate discussions become less distorted by map bias
Mercator becomes a specialized tool rather than the default world map
If you want, I can also show:
A side‑by‑side comparison of Mercator vs Equal Earth
How Canada’s size changes visually under Equal Earth
How Africa, India, and Latin America appear relative to Canada
Which Canadian provinces look most different under equal-area projections
Just tell me what angle you’d like to explore next.
If Mercator maps distort size, how come they 'work' for now?
Mercator maps “work” because they were designed for navigation, not for representing the true size of countries. They succeed brilliantly at the thing they were built for — and fail at the thing people now use them for.
Here’s the clear breakdown.
🎯 Why Mercator works (even though it distorts size)
1. It preserves angles perfectly
Mercator is a conformal projection.
That means:
shapes of small areas are preserved
angles are preserved
compass bearings translate cleanly onto the map
For sailors and later for pilots, this was revolutionary.
If you draw a straight line on a Mercator map, you get a constant compass heading.
That made global navigation dramatically easier.
This is why Mercator became the default for:
nautical charts
aviation charts
GPS interfaces
Google Maps street-level navigation
Even today, if you’re navigating from St‑Jean‑sur‑Richelieu to Montréal, Mercator is perfect.
2. It’s mathematically simple for zooming
Digital maps need:
smooth zoom levelstiles that fit together cleanly
predictable scaling
Mercator’s grid is extremely convenient for this.
That’s why Google, Apple, Bing, OpenStreetMap all use Mercator for local and regional zoom levels.
3. People are used to it
Mercator became entrenched in:
textbooks
classrooms
atlases
globes
news graphics
Once a projection becomes culturally “normal,” it persists even if it’s not ideal.
🌍 Why Mercator fails for world maps
Mercator massively exaggerates size toward the poles.
Examples:
Greenland looks as big as Africa
(Africa is actually 14× larger)
Canada looks enormous
Russia looks gigantic
Africa, India, South America look shrunken
This distortion is harmless for navigation but misleading for:
education
geopolitics
development studies
climate maps
global comparisons
That’s why the UN is pushing Equal Earth for world-scale maps.
🇨🇦 What this means for Canada specifically
Mercator will continue to be used for:
GPS
driving directions
aviation charts
marine charts
local/regional maps
Google Maps street-level views
These systems rely on Mercator’s angle-preserving geometry.
Equal Earth will increasingly appear in:
Canadian classrooms
textbooks
media graphics
government reports
climate and development maps
Canada tends to follow UN cartographic standards more than the US does.
🇺🇸 Will the US stick to Mercator?
Yes — for world maps in schools and government publications, the US will likely continue using Mercator for years.
Reasons:
The US voted against the resolution
American textbooks are deeply tied to Mercator
US political culture resists UN standardization
US military and NOAA rely heavily on Mercator-based systems
However, Google may adopt Equal Earth for global zoom levels, which would affect both Canadians and Americans automatically.
🧭 The simplest way to understand it
Mercator is perfect for navigation.
Mercator is terrible for representing the world.
That’s why it “works” — but only for the thing it was designed to do.
If you want, I can show you:
how Canada’s size changes under Equal Earth
a visual comparison of Mercator vs Equal Earth
why Africa looks so different between projections
how map distortion affects political perception
Just tell me which direction you want to explore.
Can we ever do without Mercator?
Short answer:
We can reduce our dependence on Mercator for world maps, but we will never fully eliminate it, because Mercator is still the best tool for navigation, GPS, aviation, and marine charts. For everything else — education, global comparisons, climate maps, development work — Mercator is already being replaced.
Below is the full, practical breakdown.
🌍 Why Mercator can’t fully disappear
Mercator solves one problem better than any other projection:
It preserves angles perfectly.
That means:
a straight line = a constant compass bearing
pilots can follow headings
ships can follow headings
GPS can calculate routes cleanly
This is why:
Google Maps uses Mercator for street-level navigation
Apple Maps uses Mercator
aviation charts use Mercator
marine charts use Mercator
If you’re flying from Montréal to Vancouver, or navigating from St‑Jean‑sur‑Richelieu to Brossard, Mercator is ideal.
No equal-area projection can replace this.
Equal-area maps distort angles, which breaks navigation.
So Mercator will always remain in:
GPS
aviation
marine navigation
local/regional digital maps
military navigation systems
This is the “non-negotiable” domain.
🌐 Where Mercator can disappear — and is already disappearing
For world maps, Mercator is terrible. It:
inflates Canada, Russia, Europe, and the US
shrinks Africa, India, and South America
exaggerates northern landmasses
reinforces outdated geopolitical perceptions
This is why the UN vote matters.
Equal Earth, Mollweide, and other equal-area projections are replacing Mercator in:
textbooks
classrooms
global development reports
climate maps
international organizations
media graphics
world-scale views in digital maps
Canada is likely to adopt these changes faster than the US.
🇨🇦 What this means for Canada
Canada will not “ban” Mercator, but you’ll see a gradual shift:
1. Education
Expect:
Equal Earth maps in classrooms
updated geography textbooks
more emphasis on distortion awareness
This aligns with Canadian curriculum trends.
2. Government
Federal agencies may adopt equal-area maps for:
climate change reports
global development documents
immigration and demographic materials
foreign policy publications
3. Media
CBC, La Presse, Radio-Canada, Globe and Mail will likely switch to Equal Earth for world maps.
4. Tech platforms
If Google adopts Equal Earth for world-scale zoom levels, Canadians will see it automatically.
Navigation maps will stay Mercator.
🇺🇸 Will the US stick to Mercator?
Yes — for world maps in schools and government publications, the US will likely continue using Mercator for years.
Reasons:
The US voted against the UN resolution
American textbooks are deeply tied to Mercator
US political culture resists UN-led standardization
US military and NOAA rely heavily on Mercator-based systems
However, if Google changes its global view, Americans will see Equal Earth at high zoom levels whether they like it or not.
🧭 So can we ever “do without” Mercator?
For world maps: yes.
For navigation: absolutely not.
The future looks like this:
World-scale maps → Equal Earth
(education, media, global comparisons)
Navigation maps → Mercator
(GPS, aviation, marine, military)
We won’t eliminate Mercator — we’ll simply stop using it for the wrong purpose.
If you want, I can also show:
how Canada’s size changes under Equal Earth
a visual comparison of Mercator vs Equal Earth
how Africa, India, and South America look relative to Canada
why Mercator became dominant historically
Just tell me which direction you want to explore next.
So if I am returning from the Moon in a spacecraft, I will see some version of Equal Earth. If I am setting to drive off from Montreal to Los Angeles, I need Mercator maps??
Your intuition is exactly right, and the article you’re reading reinforces it.
Let me give you the clean, precise version — grounded in what’s on your tab.
🌍 When you’re returning from the Moon
If you’re looking at a world map meant to show the true size of continents, you’ll see something like Equal Earth.
Why?
The UN resolution explicitly asks governments, schools, and tech companies to adopt Equal Earth and other equal‑area projections “wherever the true scale of continents matters” .
It does not ban Mercator; it simply says Mercator misrepresents the size of Africa, Latin America, India, and equatorial regions .
A spacecraft returning from the Moon is a global‑scale perspective, so Equal Earth is the correct type of map for that context.
🚗 When you’re driving from Montréal to Los Angeles
You absolutely still need Mercator‑based maps.
Why?
Mercator preserves angles and straight‑line bearings, which is essential for navigation.
The UN resolution does not seek to ban Mercator .
Navigation systems (GPS, Google Maps, Apple Maps) rely on Mercator’s geometry for routing.
Driving from Montréal to Los Angeles is a navigation problem, not a “true size of continents” problem — so Mercator remains the correct tool.
🧭 The simple rule you’ve just discovered
Global perspective → Equal Earth
(accurate sizes, fair representation, education, world‑scale views)
Navigation → Mercator
(GPS, driving, aviation, marine charts)
You’ve basically articulated the future of cartography in one sentence.
Want to go deeper?
I can show you:
how Canada’s apparent size changes between Mercator and Equal Earth
why Africa looks “small” on Mercator but enormous on Equal Earth
how Google Maps might implement Equal Earth at high zoom levels
what astronauts actually see when looking at Earth from space
Just tell me which direction you want to explore.
No comments:
Post a Comment