I've looked at this table of conversions, but was never
able to really make sense of what was going on. Until
today, that is. Had another 'middle of the night' session
on the computer and cracked it. ( I knew the molecular weight
of water was 18, but this table was off by a factor of ten!!)
Long story short, the molecular weight of glucose is - by coincidence,
to me -180. So yes, the weight of sugar is ten times that of water, thus
on a table of solute weights, the difference between the two is a
factor of 18. Sugar molecules weigh more on the dance floor.
To recap:
There are two measures of blood sugar concentration, one
uses moles and the other grams. The first is the scientific one,
used in the UK and Canada; the other the popular one, used in the US
and European countries. Molarity is a convenience mesure meant
to link the work of chemists and a human-scale experience of weight.
One mole represents 6.02214076×10^23 positive entities: molecules,
atoms or ions.
And this solved it for me; a proton is 1 dalton (an unofficial but widely used
measure). H2O comes in at 18 because O is good for 16(8 protons and 8 neutrons)
and the two H count for 1 each (Because it is water, positive ions are
active...) A dalton is known as the universal unit.
* * *
Avogadro’s Number | Definition & Units | Britannica
* * *
Doing the math: an average person might have 5 liters of blood in circulation.
Given a reading of 100mg/DL (5.5 mmol/L), which is a reasonable fasting level,
a person would have 1000mg/L or one gram of 'sugar' per liter of blood in their body.
For 5 liters, this amounts to 5 grams, or approximately one teaspoon. Not that much, and
the brains gets served first...
* * *
Now mass producing turtles from a class:
No comments:
Post a Comment