FPV

COPILOT:

I have read that simple drones now account for 70% of Russian losses in the field. Can you confirm this for me: https://www.lemonde.fr/international/video/2025/04/16/comment-les-drones-fpv-revolutionnent-le-champ-de-bataille-en-ukraine-le-premier-episode-de-notre-serie-video-tactiques_6596656_3210.html 

The article from Le Monde discusses the transformative impact of FPV drones on the battlefield in Ukraine. It mentions that drones, including FPV models, have become central to modern warfare, targeting infantry and vehicles alike. Researchers and observers agree that the majority of losses, both Russian and Ukrainian, are now caused by these devices. If you'd like to explore more about this topic, I can help!

In a battle situation, how might a soldier escape a drone, or perhaps, get lucky?

In a high-intensity battlefield scenario, a soldier’s chances of evading a targeting drone can depend on a blend of training, situational awareness, environmental factors, and—sometimes—pure luck. While modern drones come equipped with advanced sensor suites (including visible-light cameras, IR sensors, and even LIDAR), there are still several tactics that could potentially help a soldier avoid detection or a direct hit:

1. Exploiting Terrain and Cover: Soldiers can use natural or man-made obstacles—such as dense vegetation, urban rubble, or even ridges—to break the drone’s line of sight. Since many drones rely on visual tracking or thermal imaging, quickly moving into areas that obscure their view might reduce the chance of a continuous target lock.

2. Rapid, Unpredictable Movement: Sudden and irregular movement can sometimes confuse systems that track predictable motion patterns. In certain documented moments, soldiers have demonstrated almost reflexive maneuvers—sometimes even intercepting projectiles dropped from drones—that illustrate how unpredictability might, in rare cases, lead to a lucky escape.

3. Use of Concealment Tools: On some battlefields, smoke screens or other obscurants are deployed precisely to counter drone surveillance. These countermeasures can create visual “dead zones” or confuse thermal sensors, giving infantry an opportunity to break contact with the tracking system.

4. Electronic Countermeasures: Although typically coordinated at the unit or specialized level rather than by an individual soldier, devices designed to jam or disrupt a drone's communication link can interfere with targeting information. In some scenarios, this might buy a soldier just enough time to evade a strike—though such measures are not universally available on the ground.

5. Exploiting Operator Error and System Limitations: Even advanced drones are subject to human or technical errors. A momentary lapse from a remote operator or a glitch in the drone’s targeting algorithm can create a window of opportunity. Sometimes, the hectic nature of battle leads to miscalculations that can be a soldier’s “lucky break.”

Historically and anecdotally, there have been instances—captured on video—where soldiers have momentarily disrupted the lethal precision of drone strikes through a combination of rapid movement and fortunate timing . Such events, however, are far from reliable tactics and should be seen as outcomes of extreme, unpredictable battlefield dynamics rather than recommended strategies.

While these methods might offer a fleeting chance at survival, they are never foolproof. Modern drones are increasingly adept at tracking through various countermeasures, and adversaries continuously refine their technology and tactics. Thus, escape often comes down to a mix of trained improvisation and serendipity rather than a standardized procedure.

Thinking further, the broader implications of drone warfare have led to an evolving field of counter-drone technology where integrated systems—ranging from automated jammers to kinetic interceptors—are being developed to safeguard troops. This shift is forcing military strategists to re-examine infantry tactics, prioritizing not just offensive maneuvers but also dynamic, real-time defensive countermeasures against unmanned threats.

If you’d like to dive deeper into the intersection of modern infantry tactics and counter-drone technologies or explore historical instances of battlefield improvisations against drone strikes, there’s a wealth of discussion on how technology is reshaping survival strategies on the modern battlefield.

GOOGLE:

first-person view

The user has a first-person view (FPV) of the environment where the drone flies and may capture video or still images. FPV drones may be remotely controlled or may be programmed to fly autonomously through software-controlled flight plans accessing data from onboard sensors and GPS

IR sensor is an electronic device, that emits  light in order to sense some object of the surroundings. An IR sensor can measure the heat of an object as well as detects the motion. Usually, in the infrared spectrum, all the objects radiate some form of thermal radiation.

Lidar, also LIDAR, an acronym of "light detection and ranging" or "laser imaging, detection, and ranging" is a method for determining ranges by targeting an object or a surface with a laser and measuring the time for the reflected light to return to the receiver.