Went back to Leonardo ai. Asked the ai to generate again from the image I chose (seed), only
removing the built background. Leonardo returned the following ( with the fourth
tagged as possibly explicit).
Went back to Leonardo ai. Asked the ai to generate again from the image I chose (seed), only
removing the built background. Leonardo returned the following ( with the fourth
tagged as possibly explicit).
I'm sure many Quebec politicians will want to express their
concern over US Annual Report on Trade Barriers lists the
need to label products in French as one of those pesky barriers it
would be good to get rid of. Actually, I'm prepared to give the US a
free pass on this one. Coca Cola has no problem adapting its can
designs to the fact Mexico's residents speak Spanish; indeed it's an
opportunity to get creative about the whole thing. What is noteworthy
is that there is legislation requiring precise equal time and information
French/English on products sold in Quebec. In the grander scheme of things,
kinda weird!! But everyone needs calorie information, well-explained conditions
on meds, comprehensible tools...etc. So, one settles for practical.
Granted again, the subject is touchy. Language is religion for us, and I do not
mean to say we are fanatics about it. It is religion because it is the spiritual dimension
to our lives, how we live together and communicate. Tell US exporters of consumer
goods to hire local publicity services; they'll get funny and cute for their money...
France doesn't fool around when it comes to election funding
probity. There is public money available to parties that demonstrate
a certain theshold of support, as well as private donations. But
Marine LePen, at long last a serious contender for the Presidency of
the Republic, was just sentenced for misappropriation of public funds.
Seems that moneys meant to pay for Parliamentary Assistants while she was
in the European Parliament ended up funding the salaries of folks working
for the political party she represents. Her stance in the E Parliament was
Eurosceptic...
Not a light sentence either: a hefty fine, four years in jail (two to be served, two at
home with electronic surveillance) and a requirement to abstain from public events for
five years, effectively barring her from running in the upcoming Presidential
election. So, in effect, something of a scandal.
The Trump Administration signalled support for her, saying the US considers that
stopping someone from participating in public life was 'concerning'.
Seen from Canada, all this seems a tad overplayed. But then Mrs LePen is on the Right.
And the mere mention of the term seems to open the door to all manner of reproach.
Her supporters may not be the wealthy, who are protected from unpleasantness
in daily life, but those who must deal with things full on. Like out of control immigration.
As for her claim that this is judicial harassement, Donald Trump came through quite
a bit of that. Maybe making him a stronger President when he ultimagtely did prevail.
He powered through it all and, I must admit, I am rooting for Mrs LePen to find a
bit of humour in the situation and find solid footing as well!!
* * *
Not an easy read, the US government annual report on trade barriers, released
yesterday. Yes, Canada is there.
USTR Releases 2025 National Trade Estimate Report | United States Trade Representative
* * *
Well, I now know where my next billion USD is going:
Hey, it's April!
Been checking the White House site. The latest...
* * *
Is it possible to tell how much of the world's GDP is produced by American-owned companies?
COPILOT:
Yes, it's possible to estimate the contribution of American-owned companies to the world's GDP, although precise figures can vary depending on the methodology used. For example, the United States accounts for approximately 24% of the global economy. Additionally, American companies dominate the global market, with 65% of the total market capitalization of the world's top 100 companies.
These figures highlight the significant influence of American-owned companies on the global economy. If you'd like, I can help you explore specific industries or companies for a deeper dive!
DEEPSEEK:
In 2023, approximately 88% of the U.S. GDP was generated by private industries, which includes American-owned companies. The remaining portion, around 12%, came from government spending at various levels.
If you're curious about specific industries or sectors, let me know!
Foreign-owned companies operating in the U.S. contribute approximately 6.5% of the total GDP. This figure is based on data from majority-owned U.S. affiliates of foreign multinational enterprises. These affiliates also play a significant role in employment and investment within the U.S. economy.
Does this align with what you were expecting?
No, the U.S. does not require foreign companies operating within its borders to be majority-owned by U.S. entities. Instead, foreign companies can establish U.S. affiliates with varying ownership structures. For example, a majority-owned U.S. affiliate is one where more than 50% of the ownership is held by a foreign parent. These affiliates are common and contribute significantly to the U.S. economy, including employment and investment.
Let me know if you'd like to explore this topic further!
You're absolutely onto something! The persistent U.S. trade deficit is influenced by several factors, and the role of multinational corporations (MNCs) is a significant one. Here's how:
Production Abroad: Many U.S. multinationals establish production facilities in other countries to take advantage of lower labor costs, favorable regulations, or proximity to raw materials. Products manufactured abroad are often imported back into the U.S., contributing to the trade deficit.
Global Supply Chains: Modern supply chains are highly interconnected. A single product might involve components from multiple countries before being assembled and shipped to the U.S. This complexity can inflate import figures.
Consumer Demand: The U.S. has a strong consumer-driven economy, with high demand for goods, including those produced by American companies overseas. This demand often outpaces domestic production, leading to increased imports.
Services Surplus: While the U.S. runs a deficit in goods trade, it often has a surplus in services trade (like tech, finance, and intellectual property). However, this surplus doesn't fully offset the goods deficit.
As for America's dominance in the global internet and AI sectors, it's a testament to its innovation and leadership in technology. These industries generate significant revenue and influence, but they don't always translate directly into trade balance improvements, as much of the value lies in intangible assets and services.
Does this help clarify things? 😊
Having a relaxing day. Trying to learn Leonardo AI, image generation
and editing. Ultimately, should be able to create AI videos!!??🎬