Why has Canada legislated to phase out ICE vehicles by 2035; is there an international agreement on this?
Canada's decision to phase out internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles by 2035 is part of its broader commitment to achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. The transportation sector is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in Canada, and transitioning to zero-emission vehicles is seen as a critical step in combating climate change. The plan includes interim targets, such as requiring 60% of new vehicle sales to be electric by 2030.
On the international stage, while there isn't a single binding agreement mandating the phase-out of ICE vehicles, many countries have set similar targets. For example, Norway aims to end new ICE vehicle sales by 2025, and the European Union has proposed a 2035 deadline for phasing out new petrol and diesel cars. These initiatives align with global efforts to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, which seeks to limit global warming by reducing emissions.
Canada's legislation reflects a growing global momentum toward cleaner transportation. It's part of a collective push to address climate change, even if the specific targets and timelines vary by country.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-electric-vehicles-2035-1.7063993
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/features/multiple-u-s-states-are-implementing-ice-vehicle-ban
Has the Russian Federation made any moves toward joining the fight against climate change?
The Russian Federation has taken some steps toward addressing climate change, but its efforts have been widely criticized as insufficient. Russia has committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 and reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 70% of 1990 levels by 2030, factoring in the absorption capacity of its forests. However, its policies and actions have been rated as "critically insufficient" by the Climate Action Tracker, indicating minimal alignment with the Paris Agreement's goals.
While Russia has adopted measures like promoting renewable energy and improving energy efficiency, its heavy reliance on fossil fuel revenues and limited international climate finance contributions pose significant challenges. The Arctic region, which is warming at twice the global average, highlights the urgency for more robust climate action.
Would you like to explore specific initiatives or discuss the global implications of these efforts?
What about the BRICS countries?
The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) have made collective efforts to address climate change, though their approaches and commitments vary significantly:
Brazil: Focuses on combating deforestation in the Amazon and increasing renewable energy use, particularly hydropower.
Russia: Aims for carbon neutrality by 2060 but faces criticism for its reliance on fossil fuels.
India: Committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2070, with significant investments in solar energy and other renewables.
China: The world's largest emitter, has pledged to peak emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, with massive investments in clean energy.
South Africa: Targets net-zero emissions by 2050, with a focus on transitioning from coal to renewable energy.
Collectively, the BRICS countries emphasize the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities," advocating for developed nations to take the lead in climate action while supporting developing countries with technology and funding.
Would you like to dive deeper into any specific country's initiatives?
What implications do BRICS initiatives have for global climate agreements?
The BRICS countries play a significant role in shaping global climate agreements due to their economic influence and diverse environmental challenges. Their initiatives emphasize the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities," advocating for developed nations to lead climate action while supporting developing countries with technology and funding. This approach reinforces equity in international climate negotiations.
BRICS nations also push for multilateralism and concrete climate actions, aiming to implement the Paris Agreement comprehensively. However, internal political and financial differences among these countries can hinder their unified stance. Their collective efforts, such as promoting low-carbon transitions and sustainable development, contribute to global climate governance and highlight the importance of collaboration.
Would you like to explore specific BRICS initiatives or their impact on individual countries?
* * *
After running the last posts showing some of the difficulties with EV vehicles, I was
quite naturally asked to explain how we became commited to this transition. Thus, the
above ie everybody is on board, or paying lip-service. It is because of climate change,
(and climate change itself is a proxy for environmental deterioration, and perhaps not
always a good one...) The Environmental Movement runs the gamut, but I am not totally
on board there, either. Life and temperatures on this planet have always been changing,
and will continue to do so.
Clean air is a very nice thing. Apart from anything else, keeping things breathable is
a great idea!!!
But for all the enthusiasm and posturing on EVs in Canada, there is no doubt we are
a difficult case. Big country, lots of roads, erratic climate and we are settled everywhere.
Couldn't we just keep ICE vehicles or hybrids; if anyone needs backup on EVs, we do!!
Besides, we produce oil and gas...
👿👿
No comments:
Post a Comment