We have all seen these: videos of empty Chinese highrises and
ghost cities. China has been overbuilding to house its impressive population.
And now claims that there are some 100+ million people missing with
respect to population projections. Still, whether 1.4 or 1.3 billion is a lot
of people. But from a public policy perspective, things like the dependency
ratio (the number of inactives to the number of workers) make a big
difference. So, indeed, there are now gaps in the age distribution.
In the latter 20th century, there were concerns that the level of world population
needed to be stabilized and the UN counselled all countries to make policy adjustments
for that. The aim should be replacement fertility, with every woman giving birth to 2.1
children in her lifetime. In Canada, there is a stable 20% of the population that chooses
not to reproduce. It was decided that women in families might try for 3...
Looking at numbers today, the developed world is lagging in its reproductive goals.
Canada is pretty well stuck at 1.2 children per woman. The rest might come from
immigration. China is now lowest of the low, at 1 child per woman. And there are no
signs of picking up. And no immigration. Current projections see China's population
going down to 400 million by the year 2100. Pretty much where one expects the US
population to be. A totally dramatic change!!
So what about those empty high rises. China was totally unforgiving in its approach,
instituting a 1 child per family policy from the 1980's. And keeping it going for
three decades. They missed turn when the population reached replacement ten years
in. Of late, they have moved to allowing two and even three children but it is all of no
avail; the numbers are not moving. And what was unforeseen is that, during those
rigid one child per family years, people would choose to make that child male. So
effectively, there is a compound problem of missing women.
Voilà, urban planning got out of synch with demographic reality!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment