Peter_the_Great

Started watching this film, but couldn't make sense fo the first scene. So ended up

having a walk-through with Copilot. Maybe I can watch more this week-end...

Russia; how old was Peter the Great when he lost his natural parents?

Peter the Great lost his father, Tsar Alexis of Russia, when he was just 4 years old. His mother, Natalya Naryshkina, lived until 1694, meaning Peter was 22 years old when she passed away.

So while he lost his father very early in life, his mother remained a key figure during his formative years—even serving as regent when he became joint tsar at age 103. Quite the turbulent childhood for someone who would go on to reshape the Russian Empire.

Tell me about the uprising he witnessed at age 10...

Ah yes—the Streltsy Uprising of 1682, a defining moment in young Peter the Great’s life that left a deep psychological imprint.

🗡️ Background Peter was just 10 years old when his father died, and a succession crisis erupted. The throne was contested between Peter and his half-brother Ivan V. Though Peter was named co-tsar, the real power was held by their older sister, Sophia Alekseyevna, who acted as regent.

🔥 The Uprising The elite military corps known as the Streltsy—who were disgruntled and manipulated by political factions—stormed the Kremlin in May 1682. Their goal? To challenge Peter’s claim and support Ivan V, who was older but mentally and physically weak.

What followed was brutal violence:

Several of Peter’s maternal relatives from the Naryshkin family were murdered in front of him.

The Streltsy dragged nobles from their homes and executed them publicly.

Peter reportedly hid in terror in the Preobrazhensky Monastery, witnessing the chaos unfold.

👑 Aftermath Though Peter remained co-tsar, Sophia ruled as regent for seven more years. The trauma of this event shaped Peter’s later obsession with military reform, centralized power, and crushing dissent—he would eventually brutally suppress the Streltsy in a later rebellion.

It’s one of those moments where history pivots on a child’s trauma. You can almost trace the arc of Peter’s iron-fisted modernization of Russia back to that blood-soaked spring. Want to explore how he later dealt with the Streltsy when he came to full power?

So his father died in that uprising??

Nope—Peter the Great’s father, Tsar Alexis, died in 1676, a full six years before the Streltsy Uprising of 1682. So the uprising didn’t cause his father’s death.

What did happen during the uprising was a violent power struggle after Alexis’s death, with factions supporting Peter and his half-brother Ivan V. The Streltsy, a powerful military corps, backed Ivan and his sister Sophia, and they unleashed brutal violence to secure their position—including murdering members of Peter’s maternal family right in front of him.

So while Peter’s father wasn’t a casualty of the uprising, the trauma of witnessing that chaos at age 10 left a lasting mark on him. Want to dive into how Peter later dealt with the Streltsy when he came to full power? It's... intense.

Please...

Peter the Great’s revenge on the Streltsy Rebellion of 1698 was nothing short of terrifying—a brutal display of power that revealed just how deeply the trauma of his childhood uprising had scarred him.

⚔️ The Rebellion While Peter was abroad in Europe on his famous Grand Embassy, the Streltsy—discontented and poorly treated—rose up again. Some even tried to contact Princess Sophia, Peter’s half-sister and former regent, hoping to restore her to power.

🩸 Peter’s Response Upon hearing the news, Peter rushed back to Moscow, consumed with rage. What followed was a merciless crackdown:

Over 1,000 Streltsy were executed, many by hanging or beheading.

Torture was widespread: suspects were whipped with the knout, stretched until their limbs broke, or burned with red-hot pincers.

Peter personally participated in some executions, reportedly beheading several rebels himself to set an example.

👑 Sophia’s Fate Though she denied involvement, Sophia was imprisoned in the Novodevichy Convent, where she remained under strict surveillance for the rest of her life2.

🧠 Legacy of Fear This event marked a turning point. Peter disbanded the Streltsy regiments and removed their families from Moscow. He replaced them with modernized military units, paving the way for his sweeping reforms of the Russian army and state.

It was vengeance, yes—but also a signal: the old Russia was dying, and Peter was dragging the empire into a new age, kicking and screaming. Want to explore how this fit into his broader reforms and Westernization campaign?

Peter was ethnically European?

Peter the Great was ethnically Russian, though his ancestry included some European influences.

👑 Father: Tsar Alexis I of Russia — a member of the Romanov dynasty, which was thoroughly Russian in origin.

👩‍👦 Mother: Natalya Naryshkina — from the Naryshkin family, also Russian nobility, though her upbringing was influenced by Western ideas thanks to her guardian, Artamon Matveyev, who had strong ties to European culture.

🌍 Cultural Leanings: While Peter was Russian by blood, he was deeply fascinated by Western Europe. He traveled extensively through countries like the Netherlands, England, and Austria, even working incognito as a shipbuilder in Holland. His reforms aimed to Westernize Russia, from fashion and education to government and military structure.

So ethnically, he was Russian—but ideologically and culturally, he was a self-made European. Quite the hybrid monarch. Want to explore how his Western obsession reshaped Russian society?

How did Russians see themselves at that time, as opposed to European?

Fantastic question—because Peter the Great’s era was a turning point in how Russians saw themselves in relation to Europe.

🇷🇺 Traditional Russian Identity (Pre-Peter) Before Peter’s reforms, Russia saw itself as the Third Rome—the spiritual successor to Byzantium. This identity was:

Deeply rooted in Orthodox Christianity

Suspicious of Western Europe’s Catholicism and Protestantism

Culturally distinct, with its own language, dress, and customs

Politically isolated, with limited diplomatic or trade ties to the West

Europe, in contrast, was seen as decadent, heretical, and foreign. Russians often viewed Westerners as morally suspect and spiritually misguided.

⚡ Peter’s Disruption Peter the Great shattered that worldview. He admired European science, technology, and governance, and forced Russia to modernize:

He banned traditional dress and beards, imposing Western fashion

He built St. Petersburg, a “window to Europe,” in stark contrast to old Moscow

He reformed the military, bureaucracy, and education system using European models

This created a cultural identity crisis. Many elites embraced the new European-style Russia, while others—especially clergy and peasants—felt alienated and saw Peter’s reforms as a betrayal of Russian tradition.

🧠 Dual Identity Emerges By the end of Peter’s reign, Russia was caught between two worlds:

A Westernized elite, fluent in French and German, living in palatial homes

A traditional majority, still steeped in Orthodox values and rural life

This tension between “Slavophile” and “Westernizer” identities would echo through Russian history for centuries—from Dostoevsky to the Soviet era.

Peter didn’t just change Russia’s institutions—he cracked open the Russian soul. Want to explore how this identity split played out in later Russian literature or politics?

What languages did he speak?

Peter the Great was impressively multilingual for his time—especially considering he was a Russian tsar in the 17th century.

🗣️ Languages Peter Spoke

Russian: His native tongue, of course.

Dutch: Learned during his time working incognito in Dutch shipyards.

German: Common among European elites and useful for diplomacy.

French: The language of European aristocracy and court culture.

English: Picked up during his travels in England, especially while studying shipbuilding.

Latin and Greek: He could read both, which was rare and prestigious2.

Peter didn’t just dabble—he used these languages to absorb Western science, engineering, and politics firsthand. His linguistic skills were a tool of transformation, helping him modernize Russia from the inside out.

He wasn’t just learning languages—he was decoding civilizations. Want to explore how his travels shaped his reforms?

How tall was he?

Peter the Great was a towering figure—literally. He stood at 6 feet 8 inches (about 2.03 meters)2. That was extraordinary for the late 17th century, when the average Russian male height was likely closer to 5'5" or 5'6".

His height wasn’t just a physical trait—it became part of his legend. Foreign diplomats described him as a “second Goliath,” and his imposing presence helped reinforce his authority in court and on the battlefield. Imagine him striding through the shipyards of Amsterdam or commanding troops—he must have looked like a giant among men.

Want to hear how his physicality influenced his leadership style or public image? It’s a fascinating thread.

He had brown hair and eyes, and white skin?

Yes, historical accounts describe Peter the Great as having:

Dark brown hair, thick and short

Dark eyes, often described as black or deep brown with long lashes

Fair skin, typical of northern Russian nobility

An Italian poet who visited the Russian court noted Peter was “tall and thin, rather than stout,” with a “well-shaped mouth,” though his lower lip was slightly disfigured. He also suffered from facial tics and neck spasms, which added a layer of intensity to his already imposing presence.

So yes—brown hair, dark eyes, pale skin, and a towering 6'8" frame. He wasn’t just physically striking; he looked like someone born to command. Want to hear how his appearance played into his diplomatic encounters in Europe?

Did he mary and have children?

Yes, Peter the Great married twice and had many children, though only a few survived to adulthood.

👰 First Marriage: Eudoxia Lopukhina

Married in 1689, arranged by his mother to encourage a more traditional lifestyle.

The marriage was unhappy; Peter eventually forced her into a convent in 1698.

They had several children, including Alexei Petrovich, Peter’s eldest son, who later died under tragic circumstances after being accused of treason.

👑 Second Marriage: Catherine I

Originally a Lithuanian peasant named Marta Skavronska, she was captured during war and became Peter’s companion.

They married officially in 1712, and she was crowned Empress in 1724.

Together, they had multiple children, including:

Anna Petrovna, who married into European royalty.

Elizabeth Petrovna, who later became Empress of Russia in her own right.

👶 Total Children Peter fathered 14 children, but due to high infant mortality, only a few lived to adulthood.

His family life was as dramatic as his reign—filled with political intrigue, heartbreak, and dynastic ambition. Want to hear the story of his son Alexei and how it ended in scandal and tragedy?

What happened?

Peter the Great’s relationship with his son Alexei Petrovich ended in one of the darkest chapters of Russian royal history—a mix of betrayal, torture, and death that still stuns historians.

👨‍👦 Father vs. Son Alexei was Peter’s eldest son from his first marriage. Unlike his reformist father, Alexei leaned toward traditional Russian values and Orthodox conservatism. He resented Peter’s Westernization efforts and was seen as a rallying point for anti-reform factions.

✈️ Flight to Vienna In 1716, fearing for his safety and unwilling to follow Peter’s demands, Alexei fled to Vienna, seeking asylum under Emperor Charles VI. This was a massive scandal—Peter saw it as treason.

🕵️ Return and Interrogation Peter lured Alexei back to Russia with promises of forgiveness. But once home, Alexei was arrested, interrogated, and accused of plotting against his father. Some evidence suggests he had informal contacts with foreign powers, but nothing concrete.

🔪 Torture and Death In June 1718, Alexei was tortured repeatedly—whipped, beaten, and interrogated. On June 26, he died from his wounds, likely as a result of the torture2. Some sources say Peter may have personally overseen the interrogations.

🪦 Legacy Alexei’s death cleared the path for Peter’s younger children, especially those from his second marriage to Catherine I. But it also left a stain on Peter’s legacy—proof of how far he would go to secure his vision of a modern Russia.

It’s a tragic tale of a son caught between loyalty to tradition and a father determined to reshape an empire. Want to explore how this event shaped succession and the rise of Peter II?

How did Europe see Peter?

Europe saw Peter the Great as a paradox: a barbarian reformer, a curious monarch, and ultimately, a legitimate player on the continental stage.

🌍 Early Perceptions: The “Northern Savage” When Peter first emerged, many European elites viewed Russia as backward and semi-barbaric. Peter himself was seen as rough, impulsive, and uncouth—he drank heavily, swore, and had little patience for courtly etiquette. His towering height and intense demeanor only added to the mystique.

But then he did something extraordinary: He traveled incognito through Europe on his Grand Embassy (1697–1698), working in shipyards, studying science, and meeting with monarchs and intellectuals. This stunned Europe—no other tsar had ever done anything like it.

🛠️ Reformer and Modernizer As Peter began implementing sweeping reforms—Westernizing the military, government, fashion, and even shaving beards—Europe’s view shifted. He was seen as a visionary, dragging Russia into the modern age. Thinkers like Leibniz corresponded with him, intrigued by his embrace of Enlightenment ideals.

⚔️ Geopolitical Respect Peter’s victory in the Great Northern War against Sweden (1700–1721) was a turning point. Russia emerged as a major European power, and Peter was no longer just a curiosity—he was a force to be reckoned with.

🏛️ St. Petersburg: Russia’s European Capital The founding of St. Petersburg was symbolic. Built in European style, it was Peter’s declaration that Russia belonged in the European world.

🧠 Legacy in European Thought Historians and publicists across Europe debated Peter’s legacy. Some glorified him as a modernizer; others criticized his brutality and disregard for Russian tradition. But all agreed: he changed the game.

Peter wasn’t just seen—he was watched. Europe couldn’t ignore him, and by the time he died, Russia had stepped firmly onto the European stage. Want to explore how Enlightenment thinkers responded to his reforms?

How did the territory of Russia change during his reign?

Peter the Great dramatically reshaped Russia’s borders and geopolitical footprint, transforming it from a relatively isolated tsardom into a rising European empire.

🗺️ Key Territorial Changes Under Peter I (1682–1725)

📍 Expansion in the West: Baltic Gains

Great Northern War (1700–1721): Peter’s victory over Sweden was his crowning geopolitical achievement.

Russia gained:

Ingria and Finnish Karelia

Estonia and Livonia

Strategic ports like Narva, Revel (Tallinn), and Riga

These acquisitions gave Russia direct access to the Baltic Sea, enabling trade and naval power—crucial for Peter’s Westernization goals.

🏰 Founding of St. Petersburg

Built on the newly acquired Baltic lands, St. Petersburg became Russia’s “window to Europe.”

It replaced Moscow as the capital in 1712, symbolizing Russia’s pivot toward European engagement.

⚔️ Southern Setbacks

Peter initially captured Azov from the Ottoman Empire in 1696, hoping to gain access to the Black Sea.

But after a failed campaign in 1711, he was forced to return Azov to the Ottomans.

🌲 Siberian Consolidation

While Siberia was already under Russian control, Peter strengthened its administration and expanded settlements.

This helped solidify Russia’s vast eastern frontier, though most of his focus remained westward.

🏛️ Empire Status

In 1721, Peter declared Russia an Empire, marking its formal emergence as a major Eurasian power.

📐 By the end of his reign, Russia’s territory spanned over 4.6 million square miles, with a population of about 17.5 million, including many newly integrated Baltic peoples.

Peter didn’t just redraw maps—he redefined Russia’s place in the world. Want to explore how these territorial gains influenced Russia’s future conflicts and diplomacy?

How did Siberia become russian to begin with?

Siberia became Russian through a mix of fur-driven ambition, Cossack conquest, and imperial expansion—a process that unfolded over centuries but began in earnest in the late 16th century.

🐾 The Fur Trade Spark

Siberia was rich in luxury furs—especially sable, ermine, and fox—which were highly prized in European markets.

Russian merchants and trappers from Novgorod had long traded with native Siberian tribes, exchanging iron tools for pelts.

After Novgorod was absorbed by Moscow in 1478, the Muscovite state inherited its eastern ambitions.

⚔️ The Cossack Invasion

In 1581, a band of 540 Cossacks led by Yermak Timofeyevich invaded the Khanate of Sibir, a Tatar state that ruled western Siberia.

Despite being outnumbered, Yermak’s forces used firearms and surprise tactics to defeat Kuchum Khan, the ruler of Sibir.

By 1582, they captured Qashliq, the Siberian capital, and began building forts to consolidate control.

🏰 Forts and Tribute

The Russians established outposts like Tyumen (1586) and Tobolsk (1587), which became administrative centers for further expansion.

Indigenous tribes were forced to pay yasak—tribute in furs—to the Russian state, often under threat of violence.

🌍 Eastward Expansion

After the fall of the Siberian Khanate in 1598, Russia pushed rapidly eastward:

Reached Lake Baikal by the early 1600s

Hit the Pacific Ocean by 1639

Signed the Treaty of Nerchinsk with China in 1689, formalizing borders

☠️ Disease and Resistance

The conquest wasn’t peaceful: native resistance was fierce, and Russian forces often committed atrocities.

Smallpox and other diseases devastated indigenous populations, weakening their ability to resist.

By the time Peter the Great came to power, Siberia was already a vast Russian frontier—rich in resources, sparsely populated, and strategically vital. Want to explore how Siberia shaped Russia’s imperial identity or its role in later history?

When was the concept of "Russia' first formulated?

The concept of "Russia" has deep historical roots, but it evolved gradually over centuries. Here's a breakdown of its formation:

🏰 Kievan Rus' (9th–13th Century)

The earliest political entity associated with "Russia" was Kievan Rus', founded around 862 by Rurik, a Varangian (Norse) prince invited to rule over Slavic tribes.

Its capital was eventually moved to Kiev, and it became a powerful federation of Slavic principalities.

The people were known as Rus', and the term likely derives from Norse origins (possibly from "Ruotsi," meaning "rowers").

✝️ Christianization and Cultural Identity

In 988, Prince Vladimir of Kiev adopted Byzantine Christianity, which deeply shaped the spiritual and cultural identity of Rus'.

This religious foundation helped unify the region and laid the groundwork for a shared identity.

⚔️ Mongol Invasion and Rise of Moscow

Kievan Rus' fragmented after the Mongol invasions (1237–1240).

Moscow rose to prominence in the 14th century, eventually becoming the center of a new Russian state.

👑 Tsardom of Russia (1547)

In 1547, Ivan IV (Ivan the Terrible) declared himself Tsar of All Rus', marking the formal emergence of the Tsardom of Russia.

This was the first time "Russia" was used as a centralized imperial identity.

🏛️ Russian Empire (1721)

Peter the Great officially proclaimed the Russian Empire in 1721, after defeating Sweden in the Great Northern War.

This declaration solidified Russia’s identity as a European power and expanded its geopolitical concept.

So while the idea of "Russia" began with Kievan Rus', it wasn’t until Ivan IV’s coronation and Peter the Great’s reforms that the modern concept of Russia—as a centralized, imperial state—was truly born.

Want to explore how the name "Russia" itself evolved linguistically from "Rus'"? It's a fascinating etymological journey.

                                                               *     *     *

What is the ethymology of Kiev?

The name Kiev (or Kyiv, the official Ukrainian spelling) has a rich and somewhat debated etymology rooted in Slavic history and legend.

🏰 Legendary Origins

According to the Primary Chronicle, an early East Slavic historical text, the city was founded by three brothers—Kyi, Shchek, and Khoryv—and their sister Lybid.

The name Kyiv is traditionally said to derive from Kyi, the eldest brother, making it “Kyi’s city” or “Kyi’s fortress”.

🧠 Linguistic Roots

The Old East Slavic form is Кꙑевъ (Kyjevŭ), which evolved into Kiev in Russian and Kyiv in Ukrainian.

Some linguists suggest a connection to the Proto-Slavic root kyjь, meaning “stick” or “club,” implying a palisaded settlement—a fortified place made with wooden stakes.

🌍 Other Historical Names

In Norse sagas, the city was called Kænugarðr, meaning “city of the Kyivans.”

In Arabic sources, it appeared as Kūyāba or Zānbat.

In Byzantine Greek, it was referred to as Kiova or Sambatas, possibly indicating a hill fortress.

🇺🇦 Modern Usage

Kyiv is now the internationally recognized spelling, reflecting the Ukrainian pronunciation and distancing from the Russian-derived Kiev, especially since the Russo-Ukrainian conflict began in 2014.

So whether you lean into the legend of Kyi or the linguistic theory of wooden fortifications, the name carries centuries of cultural and political weight. Want to explore how other cities got their names?